Sarah 
The evening sun cast long shadows over the quiet lanes of Aligarh Muslim University’s Medical Colony. Inside one of the modest university quarters, Professor Shrinivas Ramchandra Siras sat alone, sipping tea and reflecting on the day’s lectures. At 64, he was nearing the end of a distinguished 22-year career at AMU, where he chaired the Department of Modern Indian Languages. Retirement was just months away, and he had begun to imagine a quieter life, perhaps writing the book he had always dreamed of.
But that evening, his life took an unexpected turn.
The knock on the door was sharp and insistent. Before he could react, the door burst open, and a group of men stormed in, their faces obscured by scarves. One of them held a camera, its red light blinking ominously. Siras froze, his teacup slipping from his hand and shattering on the floor.
“What is the meaning of this?” he demanded, his voice trembling with a mix of anger and fear.
The men ignored him, their focus entirely on the camera. They moved swiftly, capturing every corner of the room, every personal belonging, every intimate detail. Siras tried to block their path, but they pushed him aside with ease.
“This is my home! You have no right!” he shouted, but his protests fell on deaf ears.
The intrusion lasted only a few minutes, but it felt like an eternity. When the men finally left, Siras stood in the middle of his ransacked living room, his heart pounding. He felt violated, as if the walls of his home had been stripped away, exposing his most private moments to the world.
Little did he know, this was only the beginning.
The next morning, Siras woke to a cacophony of voices outside his house. Peering through the curtains, he saw a crowd of students and faculty members gathered near the gate, their faces a mix of curiosity and judgment. Some held smartphones, others whispered among themselves.
Confused, he turned on his television. The local news channel was airing a grainy video a video of him, in his own home, in a moment of intimacy with another man.
Siras felt the ground shift beneath him. His hands trembled as he switched off the TV, but the damage was done. The video had already spread like wildfire across the campus, the city, and soon, the country.
By noon, the university administration had summoned him. The meeting was brief and brutal.
“Professor Siras,” the Vice-Chancellor began, his tone cold and formal, “your actions have brought disrepute to this institution. Under Statute 40(3)(c), you are hereby suspended from your duties and must vacate your university quarters immediately.”
Siras stared at him, stunned. “My actions? What about the actions of those who broke into my home? What about my right to privacy?”
The Vice-Chancellor’s expression remained impassive. “This is a matter of tradition and morality. The university cannot condone such behavior.”
As news of Siras’ suspension spread, the campus erupted in debate. Some, like Jasim Mohammed, a Ph.D. student, rallied against him, calling for his termination. “This is a matter of Muslim culture and tradition,” Jasim declared, gathering signatures for a petition. “Such acts are unnatural and unacceptable.”
But others stood by Siras. Adil Hussain, a Mass Communication student, argued passionately in his defense. “This is a violation of his privacy. How can the university punish him for something that happened in his own home?”
Online, the reaction was even more polarized. A Facebook group titled “Justice for Dr. Siras” gained thousands of members overnight, while hashtags like #StandWithSiras and #PrivacyMatters trended on Twitter. Human rights organizations, including the Naz Foundation, reached out to offer legal support.
Yet, amidst the noise, Siras felt more alone than ever.
Siras sat in a small, dimly lit room, surrounded by a team of lawyers and activists. Anand Grover, his lead counsel, reviewed the case file with a furrowed brow.
“We’ll challenge this on multiple fronts,” Grover said. “The invasion of your privacy, the violation of your constitutional rights, and the discriminatory nature of the university’s actions.”
Siras nodded, but his mind was elsewhere. He thought of the students he had taught, the colleagues he had worked with, the life he had built at AMU. All of it now hung in the balance.
“This isn’t just about me,” he said quietly. “It’s about everyone who’s ever felt like they don’t belong. If I don’t fight, what message does that send?”
Grover smiled. “Then we fight.”
The case dragged on for months, drawing national attention and sparking heated debates about privacy, tradition, and morality. The Supreme Court’s pending decision on the decriminalization of homosexuality loomed large, adding another layer of complexity to Siras’ battle.
In the end, the court ruled in his favor, declaring that the university’s actions were a violation of his fundamental rights. Siras was reinstated, and the university issued a formal apology.
But the victory felt hollow. The scars of the ordeal ran deep, and Siras knew that his life would never be the same.
As he packed his belongings on the eve of his retirement, he paused to look at a photograph on his desk—a younger version of himself, standing proudly in front of his classroom.
“I did my best,” he whispered, his voice breaking. “That’s all anyone can do.”
And with that, he closed the door on a chapter of his life, stepping into an uncertain future with quiet resolve.
Years later, Siras’ case became a landmark in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights in India. His courage inspired countless others to stand up for their dignity and demand equality.
And though he never wrote that book he had dreamed of, his story became a testament to the power of resilience, the importance of privacy, and the enduring struggle for justice.
For More news subscribe to dipdives.com
About The Author
